Testing the Weak-Form Market Efficiency in the Indian Stock Market : Evidence from the Bombay Stock Exchange Index (BSE) Sensex

Authors

  •   Venkata Rajasekhar Ryaly Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Sri Vasavi Engineering College, Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh
  •   G. V. Subba Raju Professor & HOD, Department of Management Studies, Sri Vasavi Engineering College, Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh
  •   Bhargava Urlankula Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Sri Vasavi Engineering College, Tadepalligudem, Andhra Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i3/111647

Keywords:

Random Walk Hypothesis

, Weak-Form Market Efficiency, Indian Stock Market, Bombay Stock Exchange, Autocorrelation Test, Unit Root Test, Variance Ratio Test

G1

, G10, G14, G15

Paper Submission Date

, August 18, 2015, Paper sent back for Revision, February 7, 2016, Paper Acceptance Date, August 9, 2016.

Abstract

Performance of the stock markets is considered as a very important tool to measure the performance of the economy. In recent years, the Indian stock market has witnessed a tremendous growth in all the facets of trading , that is, number of companies listed, market capitalization, membership, value of trading ,volume of trading per day, and so forth. The Indian benchmark stock index SENSEX by June 2015 had grown massively to over 27,780.83 from 3,658 in January 1998. This unprecedented growth in the Indian stock market raises the interest over the efficiency of the stock market. The present paper tested the weak-form of market efficiency in the Indian stock market by testing the random walk hypothesis in the return series. According to the random walk hypothesis, the stock movements are random and unpredictable. Weighted index of the Bombay Stock Exchange (SENSEX) was examined for the study from 1998 to July 2015 by using daily data and weekly data. A battery of tests were applied on the data , that is, autocorrelation test, unit root test, and variance ratio test. The empirical evidence found from the autocorrelation test conclusively rejected the serial dependency in the series observed, and hence proclaimed the existence of the random walk hypothesis in the Indian stock market. ADF, DF-GLS, PP, and KPSS tests were performed to find the significance of unit root, and the results from the unit root test were consistent with the autocorrelation test. Similar and very strong evidence was found from the results of the variance ratio test also. Reasonable empirical evidence was found to prove the weak-form of market efficiency in the Indian stock market through this paper.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-01

How to Cite

Ryaly, V. R., Subba Raju, G. V., & Urlankula, B. (2017). Testing the Weak-Form Market Efficiency in the Indian Stock Market : Evidence from the Bombay Stock Exchange Index (BSE) Sensex. Indian Journal of Finance, 11(3), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijf/2017/v11i3/111647

Issue

Volume 11, Issue 3, March 2017

Section

Articles
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

Ansari, M., & Chen, J. C. (2013). Are Asia-Pacific markets efficient an empirical investigation. Finance India, 27 (1), 61-76.

Chow, K. V., & Denning, K. C. (1993). A simple multiple variance ratio test. Journal of Econometrics, 58(3), 385 - 401. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(93)90051-6

Cootner, P. (1962). Stock prices : Random vs. systematic changes. Industrial Management Review, 3 (2), 34-105.

Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimates for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74 (366), 427- 432.

Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrics, 49(4), 1057-1072.

Fama, E.F. (1965). Random walks in stock market prices. Financial Analysts Journal, 21(5), 55-59.

Fama, E.F. (1970). Efficient capital markets : A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25 (2), 383 - 417.

Fama, E.F. (1991). Efficient capital markets : II. Journal of Finance, 46 (5),1575-1617.

Fuller, W. (1976). Introduction to statistical time series. New York : John Wiley & Sons.

Godfrey, M. D., Granger, C. W. J., & Morgenstern, O. (1964). The random-walk hypothesis of stock market behavior. International Review of Social Sciences,17(1), 1- 30.

Granger, C. W. J. & Morgenstern, O. (1970). Predictability of stock market prices (1st ed.). Lexington: Heath Lexington Books.

Grossman , S. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient market. The American Economic Review, 70 (3), 393 - 408.

Huber, P. (1997). Stock market returns in thin markets : Evidence from the Vienna Stock Exchange. Applied Financial Economics, 7 (5), 493 - 498. DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/096031097333358

Islam, K. (2005) Tests of weak-form efficiency of the Dhaka Stock Exchange. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33 (7- 8), 1613 - 1624.

Jain, K., & Jain P. (2013). Empirical study of the weak form of EMH on Indian stock markets. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 2 (11), 52-59.

Jensen, M. C. (1978). Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6 (2/3), 95-101.

Kendall, M. G. (1943). The advanced theory of statistics (Vol.1). London : Charles Griffin.

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C. B., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root : How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? Journal of Econometrics, 54 (1 - 3), 159 - 178.

Li, B., & Liu, B. (2012). A variance-ratio test of random walk in international stock markets. The Empirical Economics Letters, 11(8), 775 - 782.

Ljung, G.M., & Box, G.E.P. (1978). On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65(2), 297-303.

Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walk : Evidence from a simple specification test. The Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1), 41-66.

Malkiel, B. G. (1992). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 59-82.

Moore, A. (1964). A statistical analysis of common-stock prices (Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation). Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago.

Osborne, M. M. (1959). Brownian motion in the stock market. Operations Research, 7(2), 145-173.

Phillips, P. C. B., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75 (2), 335 - 346.

Poshakwale, S. (1996). Evidence on weak form efficiency and day of the week effect in the Indian stock market. Finance India, 10 (3), 605 - 616.

Ryaly, V. R., Kumar, R. S. R. K. K., & Urlankula, B. (2014). A study on weak form of market efficiency in selected Asian stock markets. Indian Journal of Finance, 8 (11), 34 - 43. DOI: 10.17010/ijf/2014/v8i11/71842

Sharma, J.L., & Kennedy, R. A. (1977). A comparative analysis of stock price behavior on Bombay, London, and New York Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 391-413.

Vekatesan, K. (2010). Testing random walk hypothesis of Indian stock market returns : Evidence from National Stock Exchange. ICBI- University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka, pp. 1-10.

Yahoo Finance. (n.d.). Statistics. Retrieved from https://in.finance.yahoo.com/