Testing the Weak Form Efficiency with Respect to Sectoral Indices of National Stock Exchange Limited, India
Keywords:
Capital Market
, Sectoral Indices, NSE Indices, Runs Test, and Autocorrelation Function TestC22
, C58, G10, G14Paper Submission Date
, December 5, 2015, Paper sent back for Revision, February 15, 2016, Paper Acceptance Date, March 22, 2016.Abstract
The capital market is a vital institution as it facilitates economic development of a country. Investors need to know the efficiency of the stock market to invest their hard-earned money in a profitable way, while the policy makers need the latest information about different indices to devise appropriate policies. Thus, the efficiency of sectoral indices could also help the government to identify efficient sectors and to channel available resources for the growth of such sectors. This paper proposes to investigate the capital market efficiency in NSE (National Stock Exchange) sectoral indices by using daily share price returns. The aim of this study was to examine the weak form efficiency of the selected indices listed in NSE. The study found from the results of sectoral indices that NSE could not be considered under weak form efficiency during the study period.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
References
Al - Abdulqader, K.A., Hannah, G., & Power, D.M. (2007). A test of the weak–form of the efficient markets hypothesis for the Saudi stock market. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 6 ( 2), 167-190. DOI: 10.1177/097265270700600202
Alexeev, V., & Tapon, F. (2011). Testing weak form efficiency on the Toronto stock exchange. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18 (4), 661-691. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.002
Aumeboonsuke, V., & Dryver, A. L. (2014). The importance of using a test of efficiency that does not require investigating the data first. International Review of Economics and Finance, 33, 350-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.02.009
Azad, A.S.M.S., Azmat, S., Fang, V., & Edirisuriya, P. (2014). Unchecked manipulations, price-volume relationship and market efficiency : Evidence from emerging markets. Research in International Business and Finance, 30 (1), 51-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2013.05.003
Burton, G. M., & Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital market: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25 (2), 383-417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
Fama, U. F. (1998). Market efficiency, long term returns and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (3), 283-306. DOI:10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00026-9
Frimpong, J.M. (2008). Capital market efficiency. An analysis of weak form efficiency on the Ghana stock exchange. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3 (10), 2042-2048.
Jarrett, J.E. (2010). Efficient markets hypothesis and daily variation in small Pacific - Basin stock markets. Management Research Review, 33(12), 1128–1139. DOI: 10.1108/01409171011092185
Kim, J.H., & Shamsuddin, A. (2008). Are Asian stock markets efficient? Evidence from new multiple variance ratio tests. International Review of Financial Analysis, 17(3), 571-591. DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2007.07.001
Kim, J.H., Shamsuddin, A., & Lim, K.P. (2011). Stock return predictability and the adaptive markets hypothesis: Evidence from century-long U.S. data. Journal of Empirical Finance, 18 (5), 868-879. DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.08.002
Lim, K.P. (2009a). Efficiency tests of the UK financial futures markets and the impact of electronic trading systems: A note on relative market efficiency. Applied Economics Letters, 16 (11), 1129-1132. DOI: 10.1080/13504850701335350
Lim, K.P. (2009b). Weak-form market efficiency and nonlinearity: Evidence from Middle East and African Stock Indices. Applied Economics Letters, 16 (5), 519-522. DOI: 10.1080/13504850601032032
Lim, K.P., & Luo, W. (2012). The weak-form efficiency of Asian stock markets: New evidence from generalized spectral Martingale test. Applied Economics letters, 19 (10), 905-908. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2011.607123
Lingaraja, K., Selvam, M., & Vasanth, V. (2014). The stock market efficiency of emerging markets: Evidence from Asian region. Asian Social Science, 10 (19), 158-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n19p158.
Lo, A.W., & Craig, M. A. (1999). A non-random walk down Wall Street. New Jersey, NJ : Princeton University Press, Princeton. DOI: 10.1515/9781400829095
Loh, E.Y.L. (2007). An alternative test for weak form efficiency based on technical analysis. Applied Financial Economics, 17 (12), 1003-1012. DOI: 10.1080/09603100600749352
Mobarek, A., Mollah, S.A., & Bhuyan, R. (2008). Market efficiency in emerging stock market evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 7 (1), 17-41. DOI: 10.1177/097265270700700102
Nurunnabi, M. (2012). Testing weak-form efficiency of emerging economies. A critical review of literature. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13 (1), 167-188. DOI: 10.3846/16111699.2011.620140
Ozdenir, Z.A. (2008). Efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from small open economy. Applied Economics, 40 (5), 633-641. DOI: 10.1080/00036840600722315
Punithavathy, P., & Queensly Jeyanthi, B. J. Q. (2008). Rolling settlement and market efficiency of NSE. SMART Journal of Business Management Studies, 4 (1), 42-46.
Rajesh R., Ramkumar, D., Selvam, M., Vanitha, S., Gayathri, J., & Karpagam, V. (2012). An analysis of market efficiency in sectoral indices: A study with a special reference to Bombay Stock Exchange in India. European Journal of Scientific Research, 69 (2), 290-297.
Ryaly, V.R., Kumar, R. S. R. K. K. & Urlankula, B. (2014). A study on weak-form of market efficiency in selected Asian stock markets. Indian Journal of Finance, 8 (11), 34-43. DOI: 10.17010//2014/v8i11/71842
Squalli, J. (2006). A non-parametric assessment of weak-form efficiency in the UAE financial markets. Applied Financial Economics, 16 (18), 1365-1373. DOI: 10.1080/09603100500447594
Walid, A. (2010). Testing the evolving efficiency of Arab stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 19 (1), 25-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2009.11.004
Weiss, H. K. (1964). The random character of stock market prices. Operation Research, 14 (5), 962-965.