New Product Launch and Stock Returns in the Period of Demonetization : Cross Section and Multivariate Time Series Analysis

Authors

  •   Himanshu Joshi Associate Professor, FORE School of Management, B-18, Qutub Institutional Area New Delhi -110 016

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2017/v4/i4/120916

Keywords:

Demonetization

, New Product Launch, Stock Returns, Time Series Analysis

F3

, F6, G1

Paper Submission Date

, November 6, 2017, Paper sent back for Revision, December 19, Paper Acceptance Date, December 28, 2017.

Abstract

The period of demonetization witnessed negative stock returns and earnings growth rates across various industries in India. The average weekly returns during this period on benchmark BSE Sensex was -0.42%, translating into an annualized return of -20.34 %. Using the discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation formula, under the imperfect market conditions, new product innovations can create shareholders' value by affecting one of the two variables: (a) future cash flows that are expected to be produced by the business ; and (b) capital providers' required rate of return at which those cash flows are discounted by the market. A firm can beat competition and increase its future cash flows by indulging in product innovation and launching such new products, which are able to command higher prices in the consumer market. New product innovations can also support the revival of products, which are in declining stages of their product lifecycle, and in turn can reduce uncertainty around a firm's cash flows. Reduction in cash flow uncertainty results in lower required rate of returns by capital providers. Consequently, new product launches can create shareholders' value, which can be captured by stock returns. The present paper used cross section data for listed Indian firms to study investors' response to new product launches in the period of demonetization, that is, October - December 2016. To establish a long-term effect of new product launches on stock returns, a multivariate time series analysis was also conducted for a single firm Maruti Suzuki for 26 quarters ending December 2016. The results suggested that a new product launch has a significant positive impact on quarterly EPS growth rate, and stock returns in the long run as well as in the short run. Also, in the crisis period of demonetization, where all the firms across various industries registered negative growth in EPS and hugely negative stock returns, new product launch worked as a savior for the firm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

Joshi, H. (2017). New Product Launch and Stock Returns in the Period of Demonetization : Cross Section and Multivariate Time Series Analysis. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 4(4), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijrcm/2017/v4/i4/120916

References

Boulding, W., Lee, E., & Staelin, R. (1994). Mastering the mix: Do advertising, promotions, and sales force activities lead to differentiation? Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 159 - 172. doi: 10.2307/3152191

Chaney, P.K., Devinney, T. M., & Winer, R. S. (1991). The impact of new-product introductions on the market value of firms. The Journal of Business, 64 (4), 573 - 610.

Cooper, R.G. (2011). The innovation dilemma: How to innovate when market is mature. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (1), 2 - 27.

Das, A., & Megaravalli, A.V. (2017). Macroeconomic indicators and stock market boogie: The case of National Stock Exchange, India. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 4 (3), 20 - 32. doi: 10.17010/ijrcm/2017/v4/i3/118913

Ghemawat, P. (1991). Market incumbency and technological inertia. Marketing Science, 10 (2), 161-171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.10.2.161

Jenson, M. C. (2000). Value maximization and corporate objective function. In M. Beer & N. Noharia (eds.), Breaking the code of change. Boston : Harvard Business School Press.

Lehman, D. R. (2004). Metrics for making marketing matter. Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 73 - 75.

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48 (3), 261 - 297.

Pal, K., & Mittal, R. (2011). Impact of macroeconomic indicators on Indian capital markets. The Journal of Risk Finance, 12 (2), 84 - 97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/15265941111112811

Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., Srinivasan, S., & Hanssens, D.M. (2004). New products, sales promotions, and firm value: The case of the automobile industry. Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 142-156.

Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter. G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004). Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 76-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.76.42721

Sharma, G. D., Mahendru, M., & Singh, S. (2015). Impact of sales, net profit, and EPS on stock behavior in emerging markets: A study of Indian companies. Indian Journal of Research in Capital Markets, 2 (4), 7-19. DOI: 10.17010/ijrcm/2015/v2/i4/102614

Sivadas, E., & Dwyer, F. R. (2000). A comparison of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. Journal of Marketing, 64 (1), 31- 49.

Srinivasan, S., Pauwels, K., Silva-Risso, J., & Hanssens, D. M. (2009). Product innovations, advertising, and stock returns. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 24 - 43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.24

Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A, & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2 -18.